the machine runs fine under 128 samples.
 do you use any compressors at all when tracking.
 only  things i’m using is the waves a p i  2500 on the vocal augs track, and 
one of the reverbs in pt itself. 
Steve

> On 10 Feb 2015, at 4:29 am, Poppa Bear <heavens4r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I use 128 all day with my clients and they never even notice any delay and 
> that is with a template that has some compressors and reverbs. You must have 
> some sharp ears brother. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf 
> Of Steve Sparrow
> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2015 9:06 AM
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: p t 10 and a a x plugins
> 
> Hi. yes i can raise the buffer size, but when i rais it up to the next 
> setting, 128 samples, i am getting annoying delay, si 64 samples seems to be 
> the only setting where it sounds reasonable.e for tracking. I do have a 
> couple of plugins,  compressor and a reverb unit set up swell, so i know this 
> adds to the load. is there anything else i can do to minimise clicks and 
> pops. Really i think the answer would more than likely be more ram.
> Steve
> 
>> On 9 Feb 2015, at 10:45 pm, TheOreoMonster <monkeypushe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> If you are having pops and clicks in your audio raise the sample size of 
>> your buffer. So long as you aren’t trying to monitor through effects this 
>> shouldn’t affect anything. There was also a way to trash AAX plug ins so 
>> that it would force PT 10 to fall back to RTAS versions which were 
>> accessible. but there is a caviot regarding that, which I am blanking on at 
>> the moment, maybe someone else can weigh in there.
>> 
>> On Feb 9, 2015, at 3:57 AM, Steve Sparrow <i...@sparrowsound.com.au> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi. i am thinking about using protools 10.39 fro some of my recording for a 
>>> while. Reason being this system really needs more ram. i only have 4 gig in 
>>> this thing. the machine tseems to run better in protools 10. only thing is 
>>> the plugins seem a bit inaccessible. I think this was mentioned in the mat 
>>> and rob tutorial. is there as issue with 10.39 and a a x,is there a way of 
>>> using my plugins in 10.39 or is there something i can do to make them 
>>> accessible.
>>> 
>>> If this is not possible, i’ll put up with a few pops and clicks until i get 
>>> a new mac.
>>> Steve
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to