On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 21:51:00 +0200, Hervé Girod
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just saw on W3C Web site that Web appformats WG has released a Last
Call Working Draft for XBL 2.0, and I have some questions about the WG
strategy about XBL 2.0 / sXBL relationship.
- will the sXBL working draft be dropped in favor of the more general
XBL 2.0 (there is a specific chapter on XBL 2.0 with SVG, and it seems,
by looking at the table of contents, that the xSBL TOC is a subset of
XBL 2. TOC too) ?
That's my understanding. I'm not sure if there are any plans to update
sXBL to point that out though. I suppose that would be a good thing to do
once XBL 2.0 reaches either Candidate Recommendation or Recommendation
status.
- is sXBL a subset of XBL 2.0, or is there some (volontary) subtle
differences between the two recomandations ?
http://annevankesteren.nl/2005/11/xbl lists the differences, but it hasn't
been updated to take later changes into account. Then again, I think there
aren't that many (later changes).
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
