public-appformats  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [access-control] Requirement #5 Anne van Kesteren
• Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Ian Hickson
  • Re: Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Thomas Roessler
  • Re: Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Ian Hickson
  • Re: Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs John Panzer
  • RE: Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Close, Tyler J.
  • Re: Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Subbu Allamaraju
  • Re: Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Arthur Barstow
  • RE: Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Close, Tyler J.
  • Re: Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Subbu Allamaraju
  • Re: Proposal for ... POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Thomas Roessler
  • Re: Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Proposal for ... POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Proposal for ... POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs John Panzer
  • Re: Proposal for ... POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Proposal for ... POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs John Panzer
  • Re: Proposal for ... POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Proposal for ... POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Ian Hickson
  • Re: Proposal for ... POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Jonas Sicking
  • Re: Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Jonas Sicking
  • Re: Proposal for ... POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Proposal for ... POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Jonas Sicking
  • Re: Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Ian Hickson
  • Re: Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Jonas Sicking
  • Re: Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Jonas Sicking
  • Re: Proposal for a way to avoid a round-trip on every POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Ian Hickson
  • Re: Proposal for ... POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Proposal for ... POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Proposal for ... POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Ian Hickson
  • Re: Proposal for ... POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Proposal for ... POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Jonas Sicking
  • Re: Proposal for ... POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Ian Hickson
  • Re: Proposal for ... POST when dealing with large numbers of URIs Anne van Kesteren
• On Requirement 9 and "deny" Thomas Roessler
  • Re: On Requirement 9 and "deny" Jonas Sicking
  • Re: On Requirement 9 and "deny" Anne van Kesteren
• Minutes from 30 January 2008 Voice Conference on Access Control Arthur Barstow
  • Re: Minutes from 30 January 2008 Voice Conference on Access Control Thomas Roessler
• ACTION-158: Input for requirement 1.1 Thomas Roessler
  • Re: ACTION-158: Input for requirement 1.1 Anne van Kesteren
• Requirement 11 Thomas Roessler
  • Requirement 10 (Re: Requirement 11) Thomas Roessler
  • Re: Requirement 10 Anne van Kesteren
• ACTION-165: New wording for requirement 12 Jonas Sicking
  • Re: ACTION-165: New wording for requirement 12 Anne van Kesteren
• ACTION-162: Suggested new wording for requirement 4 Jonas Sicking
  • Re: ACTION-162: Suggested new wording for requirement 4 Anne van Kesteren
• Req 1.2 Thomas Roessler
  • Re: Req 1.2 Anne van Kesteren
• Fwd: [rest-discuss] W3C Working Group on Cross-Domain requests needs your feedback Arthur Barstow
• Agenda for 30 January 2008 Voice Conference Arthur Barstow
• [access-control] syntax is still suboptimal? Arthur Barstow
  • Re: [access-control] syntax is still suboptimal? Mark Nottingham
  • Re: [access-control] syntax is still suboptimal? Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: [access-control] syntax is still suboptimal? Mark Nottingham
  • Re: [access-control] syntax is still suboptimal? Ian Hickson
  • Re: [access-control] syntax is still suboptimal? Mark Nottingham
• ISSUE-22 (ac4csr-webarch): The AC4CSR spec and "webarch" [Access Control] Web Application Formats Working Group Issue Tracker
  • Re: ISSUE-22 (ac4csr-webarch): The AC4CSR spec and "webarch" [Access Control] Anne van Kesteren
  • RE: ISSUE-22 (ac4csr-webarch): The AC4CSR spec and "webarch" [Access Control] David Orchard
  • Re: ISSUE-22 (ac4csr-webarch): The AC4CSR spec and "webarch" [Access Control] Arthur Barstow
• ACTION-154: policy decision / enforcement points Thomas Roessler
  • Re: ACTION-154: policy decision / enforcement points Jon Ferraiolo
  • Re: ACTION-154: policy decision / enforcement points Thomas Roessler
• Minutes from 23 January 2008 Voice Conference on Access Control Arthur Barstow
  • time change for WAF WG telcons [was: Minutes from 23 January 2008 Voice Conference on Access Control] Michael(tm) Smith
  • Re: time change for WAF WG telcons [was: Minutes from 23 January 2008 Voice Conference on Access Control] Jonas Sicking
  • Re: time change for WAF WG telcons [was: Minutes from 23 January 2008 Voice Conference on Access Control] Thomas Roessler
  • Re: time change for WAF WG telcons [was: Minutes from 23 January 2008 Voice Conference on Access Control] Marcos Caceres
• Review of 22 Jan editor's draft Thomas Roessler
  • Re: Review of 22 Jan editor's draft Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Review of 22 Jan editor's draft Thomas Roessler
  • Re: Review of 22 Jan editor's draft Anne van Kesteren
  • method check result cache? (was: Re: Review of 22 Jan editor's draft) Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: method check result cache? (was: Re: Review of 22 Jan editor's draft) Thomas Roessler
  • OPTIONS and redirects (was: Re: Review of 22 Jan editor's draft) Anne van Kesteren
  • redirect model for non-GET requests (Re: OPTIONS and redirects (was: Re: Review of 22 Jan editor's draft)) Thomas Roessler
  • Re: redirect model for non-GET requests Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: redirect model for non-GET requests Jonas Sicking
  • Re: redirect model for non-GET requests Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: redirect model for non-GET requests John
  • Re: redirect model for non-GET requests Jonas Sicking
  • Re: redirect model for non-GET requests Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: redirect model for non-GET requests Jonas Sicking
• [access-control] Editorial comments on Requirements Appendix v1.137 Arthur Barstow
  • Re: [access-control] Editorial comments on Requirements Appendix v1.137 Jon Ferraiolo
  • Re: [access-control] Editorial comments on Requirements Appendix v1.137 Jonas Sicking
  • Re: [access-control] Editorial comments on Requirements Appendix v1.137 Jon Ferraiolo
  • Re: [access-control] Editorial comments on Requirements Appendix v1.137 Jonas Sicking
  • Re: [access-control] Editorial comments on Requirements Appendix v1.137 Anne van Kesteren
  • RE: [access-control] Editorial comments on Requirements Appendix v1.137 David Orchard
  • Re: [access-control] Editorial comments on Requirements Appendix v1.137 Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: [access-control] Editorial comments on Requirements Appendix v1.137 Ian Hickson
  • Re: [access-control] Editorial comments on Requirements Appendix v1.137 Anne van Kesteren
• Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Ian Hickson
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Thomas Roessler
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Thomas Roessler
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Thomas Roessler
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Jonas Sicking
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Jonas Sicking
  • P3P - Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
  • Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Ian Hickson
  • Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Jonas Sicking
  • Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
  • Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
  • RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Close, Tyler J.
  • RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Ian Hickson
  • RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Close, Tyler J.
  • Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Ian Hickson
  • RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Close, Tyler J.
  • Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
  • RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Close, Tyler J.
  • RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Ian Hickson
  • RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Close, Tyler J.
  • RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Ian Hickson
  • Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
  • RE: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Dave Orchard
  • Re: P3P - Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Ian Hickson
  • Method-Check-Expires (was: Re: Feedback on Access Control) Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Method-Check-Expires (was: Re: Feedback on Access Control) Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Method-Check-Expires Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Method-Check-Expires (was: Re: Feedback on Access Control) Ian Hickson
  • Re: Method-Check-Expires (was: Re: Feedback on Access Control) Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Method-Check-Expires (was: Re: Feedback on Access Control) Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Jonas Sicking
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Feedback on Access Control Anne van Kesteren
• Agenda for 23 January 2008 Voice Conf Arthur Barstow
• [fwd] common dns misconfiguration can lead to "same site" scripting (from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Thomas Roessler
• Access Control: integrated Requirements, Use Cases and FAQ Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Access Control: integrated Requirements, Use Cases and FAQ Jon Ferraiolo
  • RE: Access Control: integrated Requirements, Use Cases and FAQ David Orchard
  • Re: Access Control: integrated Requirements, Use Cases and FAQ Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Access Control: integrated Requirements, Use Cases and FAQ Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Access Control: integrated Requirements, Use Cases and FAQ Arthur Barstow
  • RE: Access Control: integrated Requirements, Use Cases and FAQ David Orchard
  • Re: Access Control: integrated Requirements, Use Cases and FAQ Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Access Control: integrated Requirements, Use Cases and FAQ Jonas Sicking
• Access Control open/raised issues Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Access Control open/raised issues Jonas Sicking
  • Fwd: Access Control open/raised issues Arthur Barstow
  • Re: Access Control open/raised issues Arthur Barstow
  • RE: Access Control open/raised issues David Orchard
  • Re: Access Control open/raised issues Anne van Kesteren
• [ac] Security concerns Jonas Sicking
  • Re: [ac] Security concerns Arthur Barstow
• Access control requirements Jonas Sicking
  • Re: Access control requirements Arthur Barstow
  • Re: Access control requirements Jonas Sicking
• [waf] Minutes from 16 January 2008 Voice Conference on Access Control Arthur Barstow
• linking pre-check to POST and other requests? Thomas Roessler
  • Re: linking pre-check to POST and other requests? Ian Hickson
  • Re: linking pre-check to POST and other requests? Thomas Roessler
  • Re: linking pre-check to POST and other requests? Jonas Sicking
  • Re: linking pre-check to POST and other requests? Anne van Kesteren
• Use case for cross-site DELETE, PUT, ...? Thomas Roessler
  • Re: Use case for cross-site DELETE, PUT, ...? Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Use case for cross-site DELETE, PUT, ...? Thomas Roessler
  • Re: Use case for cross-site DELETE, PUT, ...? Thomas Roessler
• Access-Control: Proposed restructuring David Orchard
  • Re: Access-Control: Proposed restructuring Ian Hickson
  • RE: Access-Control: Proposed restructuring David Orchard
  • RE: Access-Control: Proposed restructuring Ian Hickson
  • Re: Access-Control: Proposed restructuring Anne van Kesteren
  • RE: Access-Control: Proposed restructuring David Orchard
  • Re: Access-Control: Proposed restructuring Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: Access-Control: Proposed restructuring James Graham
  • Re: Access-Control: Proposed restructuring Thomas Roessler
• RE: Request for review on Access Control for Cross-site Requests Grosso, Paul
• specification style; last call Thomas Roessler
  • RE: specification style; last call David Orchard
• [ac] XBL Use Case input Arthur Barstow
• FAQ & Use Cases Anne van Kesteren
  • Re: FAQ & Use Cases Jon Ferraiolo
  • Re: FAQ & Use Cases Ian Hickson
  • Re: FAQ & Use Cases Thomas Roessler

• Earlier messages
• Later messages