public-appformats

Messages by Date

2008/01/17 Re: FAQ & Use Cases Arthur Barstow
2008/01/17 [ac] Security concerns Jonas Sicking
2008/01/17 Re: <form> POST versus Access Control POST Jonas Sicking
2008/01/16 Access control requirements Jonas Sicking
2008/01/16 Re: FAQ & Use Cases Thomas Roessler
2008/01/16 Re: FAQ & Use Cases Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/16 Re: linking pre-check to POST and other requests? Thomas Roessler
2008/01/16 Re: Use case for cross-site DELETE, PUT, ...? Thomas Roessler
2008/01/16 Re: Use case for cross-site DELETE, PUT, ...? Thomas Roessler
2008/01/16 Re: Use case for cross-site DELETE, PUT, ...? Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/16 Re: linking pre-check to POST and other requests? Ian Hickson
2008/01/16 [waf] Minutes from 16 January 2008 Voice Conference on Access Control Arthur Barstow
2008/01/16 linking pre-check to POST and other requests? Thomas Roessler
2008/01/16 Use case for cross-site DELETE, PUT, ...? Thomas Roessler
2008/01/16 Re: FAQ & Use Cases Thomas Roessler
2008/01/16 Re: Access-Control: Proposed restructuring James Graham
2008/01/16 Re: Access-Control: Proposed restructuring Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/16 RE: Access-Control: Proposed restructuring David Orchard
2008/01/16 Re: Access-Control: Proposed restructuring Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/16 RE: Access-Control: Proposed restructuring Ian Hickson
2008/01/16 Re: FAQ & Use Cases Ian Hickson
2008/01/16 RE: Access-Control: Proposed restructuring David Orchard
2008/01/16 Re: Access-Control: Proposed restructuring Thomas Roessler
2008/01/16 Re: Access-Control: Proposed restructuring Ian Hickson
2008/01/16 Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Thomas Roessler
2008/01/16 RE: specification style; last call David Orchard
2008/01/16 Access-Control: Proposed restructuring David Orchard
2008/01/16 Re: FAQ & Use Cases Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/16 RE: Request for review on Access Control for Cross-site Requests Grosso, Paul
2008/01/16 specification style; last call Thomas Roessler
2008/01/16 [ac] XBL Use Case input Arthur Barstow
2008/01/16 FAQ & Use Cases Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/16 <form> POST versus Access Control POST Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/16 Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/16 Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/16 Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/15 Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Bjoern Hoehrmann
2008/01/15 Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/15 [waf] Access Control Issue 19: Requirements document updated dated 20080114 David Orchard
2008/01/15 Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Arthur Barstow
2008/01/15 Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/15 RE: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/15 RE: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document David Orchard
2008/01/15 RE: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/15 RE: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Brad Porter
2008/01/15 RE: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document David Orchard
2008/01/15 Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/15 Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/15 ISSUE-21: What is the Security Model for the access-control spec? [Access Control] Web Application Formats Working Group Issue Tracker
2008/01/15 Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Arthur Barstow
2008/01/15 Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/14 Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Mark Nottingham
2008/01/14 Re: Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Mark Nottingham
2008/01/14 RE: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document David Orchard
2008/01/14 Re: More clarity about cookie handling Thomas Roessler
2008/01/14 Fwd: OPTIONS and Method-Check Arthur Barstow
2008/01/14 Minutes from WAF WG's 9 January 2008 meeting Arthur Barstow
2008/01/14 Re: More clarity about cookie handling Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/13 Re: More clarity about cookie handling Thomas Roessler
2008/01/12 Re: OPTIONS and Method-Check Ian Hickson
2008/01/12 Re: [waf] Draft of merged Web Apps WG charter available Arthur Barstow
2008/01/12 Re: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/12 Re: Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Thomas Roessler
2008/01/12 Comments on requirements document Thomas Roessler
2008/01/12 Re: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) Brad Porter
2008/01/12 Re: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/12 Re: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) Mark Nottingham
2008/01/11 RE: [waf] Draft of merged Web Apps WG charter available David Orchard
2008/01/11 Re: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/11 Re: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/11 [access-control] Requirements, UCs and design rationale [Was: Subject: Re: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) ] Arthur Barstow
2008/01/11 RE: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) David Orchard
2008/01/11 Re: [waf] minutes from 9 January 2008 Voice Conf (fwd) Ian Hickson
2008/01/11 Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/ Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/11 Re: Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Ian Hickson
2008/01/11 Re: Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Ian Hickson
2008/01/10 Re: Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Brad Porter
2008/01/10 Re: Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Brad Porter
2008/01/10 Re: Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Mark Nottingham
2008/01/10 Re: Brad Porter
2008/01/10 Re: Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Brad Porter
2008/01/10 Re: Mark Nottingham
2008/01/10 Examining the 'no server modification' requirement Mark Nottingham
2008/01/09 Re: Are Jon's comments from IBM, the OAA, citizen Jon, ...? [Was: Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/] Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/09 Re: Are Jon's comments from IBM, the OAA, citizen Jon, ...? [Was: Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/] Brad Porter
2008/01/09 Re: Are Jon's comments from IBM, the OAA, citizen Jon, ...? [Was: Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/] Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/09 Re: Are Jon's comments from IBM, the OAA, citizen Jon, ...? [Was: Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/] Brad Porter
2008/01/09 RE: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/ Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)
2008/01/09 Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/ Brad Porter
2008/01/09 Re: Are Jon's comments from IBM, the OAA, citizen Jon, ...? [Was: Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/] Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/09 Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/ Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/09 [no subject] Brad Porter
2008/01/09 Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Arthur Barstow
2008/01/09 Are Jon's comments from IBM, the OAA, citizen Jon, ...? [Was: Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/] Arthur Barstow
2008/01/09 Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Arthur Barstow
2008/01/09 Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/ Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/09 Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/09 Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/ Jonas Sicking
2008/01/08 Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Mark Nottingham
2008/01/08 Re: ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/08 Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/ Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/08 Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/ Mark Nottingham
2008/01/08 Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Arthur Barstow
2008/01/08 Re: Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/ L. David Baron
2008/01/08 Review of http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-access-control-20071126/ David Orchard
2008/01/08 ISSUE 19: Requirements and Usage Scenarios document David Orchard
2008/01/08 Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/08 Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Thomas Roessler
2008/01/08 Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Thomas Roessler
2008/01/08 Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Thomas Roessler
2008/01/08 RE: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Close, Tyler J.
2008/01/08 Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/07 Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Jonas Sicking
2008/01/07 Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Mark Nottingham
2008/01/07 RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
2008/01/07 RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests David Orchard
2008/01/07 Re: [waf] New Charter proposal Doug Schepers
2008/01/07 Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Bertrand Le Roy
2008/01/07 Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Henri Sivonen
2008/01/07 Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Henri Sivonen
2008/01/07 Re: [waf] New Charter proposal Arthur Barstow
2008/01/07 Re: [waf] New Charter proposal Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/07 Re: [waf] New Charter proposal Doug Schepers
2008/01/06 Re: [waf] New Charter proposal Mark Nottingham
2008/01/06 Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/06 Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Jonas Sicking
2008/01/05 Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Jonas Sicking
2008/01/05 Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Emmanouil Batsis (Manos)
2008/01/05 Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Bjoern Hoehrmann
2008/01/05 Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Bjoern Hoehrmann
2008/01/05 Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Henri Sivonen
2008/01/05 Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Henri Sivonen
2008/01/05 Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Jonas Sicking
2008/01/05 Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Bjoern Hoehrmann
2008/01/04 Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/04 RE: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Close, Tyler J.
2008/01/04 RE: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Bertrand Le Roy
2008/01/04 Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/04 Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/04 RE: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Close, Tyler J.
2008/01/04 RE: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Bertrand Le Roy
2008/01/04 Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/04 Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Bertrand Le Roy
2008/01/04 Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Bertrand Le Roy
2008/01/04 Re: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Arthur Barstow
2008/01/04 RE: GET / HEAD / OPTIONS David Orchard
2008/01/04 Re: ISSUE-20: Client and Server model [Access Control] Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/04 RE: ISSUE-20: Client and Server model [Access Control] David Orchard
2008/01/04 Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/04 Re: ISSUE-20: Client and Server model [Access Control] Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/04 RE: ISSUE-20: Client and Server model [Access Control] Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/04 GET / HEAD / OPTIONS Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/04 RE: ISSUE-20: Client and Server model [Access Control] David Orchard
2008/01/04 Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/04 Re: ISSUE-20: Client and Server model [Access Control] Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/04 Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/04 Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/04 Re: ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/04 ISSUE-20: Client and Server model [Access Control] Web Application Formats Working Group Issue Tracker
2008/01/04 ISSUE-19: What are the Requirements, Design Principles and Use Cases? [Access Control] Web Application Formats Working Group Issue Tracker
2008/01/04 ISSUE-18: Is JSONRequest an acceptable alternative to the current model? [Access Control] Web Application Formats Working Group Issue Tracker
2008/01/03 Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/03 Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/03 Re: GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/03 RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
2008/01/03 Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jonas Sicking
2008/01/03 RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/03 GET vs HEAD vs OPTIONS Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/03 RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
2008/01/03 Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jonas Sicking
2008/01/03 RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
2008/01/03 Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jonas Sicking
2008/01/03 Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jonas Sicking
2008/01/03 Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/03 Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/02 Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Mark Nottingham
2008/01/02 RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Ian Hickson
2008/01/02 RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
2008/01/02 RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
2008/01/02 RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Ian Hickson
2008/01/02 RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
2008/01/02 Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Mark Nottingham
2008/01/02 Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Mark Nottingham
2008/01/02 RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Ian Hickson
2008/01/02 Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Jonas Sicking
2008/01/02 RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
2008/01/02 RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Ian Hickson
2008/01/02 Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Ric Johnson
2008/01/02 Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Douglas Crockford
2008/01/02 Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/02 RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
2008/01/02 Re: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Anne van Kesteren
2008/01/02 RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
2008/01/02 Re: [widgets] Open Ajax Alliance Jon Ferraiolo
2008/01/02 Fwd: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Arthur Barstow
2008/01/02 Re: [widgets] Open Ajax Alliance José Manuel Cantera Fonseca
2008/01/01 RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Ian Hickson
2007/12/31 RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
2007/12/31 RE: Comments on: Access Control for Cross-site Requests Close, Tyler J.
2007/12/27 Fw: Another XBL 'player' Cameron McCormack