On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:29:42 +0200, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, forget the ? notation. Your examples are very clear and we seem in
full alignment that <foo.com> includes sub domains but <*.foo.com>
wouldn't include foo.com itself.
Sounds great. What do other people think of switching to this syntax?
The difference from the current spec would be to change
The only slightly confusing thing is that <http://foo.com> also matches
<http://bar.foo.com> but I suppose that's ok.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
