On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 22:50:05 +0200, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:29:42 +0200, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
OK, forget the ? notation. Your examples are very clear and we seem
in full alignment that <foo.com> includes sub domains but <*.foo.com>
wouldn't include foo.com itself.
Sounds great. What do other people think of switching to this syntax?
The only slightly confusing thing is that <http://foo.com> also
matches <http://bar.foo.com> but I suppose that's ok.
Yeah, I agree, but given all other alternatives I think this is better.
Integrated.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
