Hi Michael,

Michael Hausenblas wrote:
Francois,

Thanks for your feedback and the question. Though I'm not sure what you technically mean with 'my:links is a named graph' :)
The system output the links in a named graph. See the following example in TRiG:

<my:links>
{
 <http://kmi.open.ac.uk/fusion/dblp#document1632795751_264>
 owl:same_as
<http://kmi.open.ac.uk/fusion/dblp#document1ad8378bff1fe32cd13989741b50fe3eaef0db93> .
}

We can then describe it as a void:Linkset as I've described below. This allows to attach other information such as the author of the linkset, the parameters of the algorithm used to generate it, etc.

I think the answer is simple: indeed we decided to model datasets and linksets independently from each other. The following example from the (not yet publicly available) voiD guide may illustrate this:

Let's assume the two well-known linked datasets DBpedia and DBLP:

:DBpedia void:containsLinks :DBpedia2DBLP  .

:DBpedia2DBLP rdf:type void:Linkset ;
              void:target :DBLP .

So, it is a linking *from* DBpedia *to* DBLP; as RDF is a direct graph, this makes sense quite a lot (the subject 'sits' in DBpedia, the object in DBLP).

IIRC, we had your option in mind as well [1] but decided to go for the current modeling due to the above reasons. Actually, as I think, the two modelings are equivalent, just with reversed directions:

YOUR model (if I got it right):

 :dataset1 <- void:target - :links - void:target - > :dataset2

Right.

voiD model:

 :dataset1 - void:containsLinks -> :links - void:target - > :dataset2

There's quite a difference between the two models. In the actual voiD model it is supposed that the links are included in one of the datasets. This approach raises again the owl:same_as related problems of stating logical equivalence of resources as part of the dataset itself. Experience in ontology alignment shows that it's wiser to consider the linkset as a separate entity pointing to both (or more) datasets. This also allows to have more than one linkset for a given pair of datasets (why not, I can trust one linkset more than the other...). Finding links from a dataset is done by querying on void:Linkset objects pointing to this dataset. Actually, this approach is followed by the oddLinker of LinkedMDB, a linkset being recorded as a oddlinker:linkage_run entity.


Cheers,
Francois


Cheers,
    Michael

[1] http://community.linkeddata.org/MediaWiki/index.php?MetaLOD#Discussion

----------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan,
Galway, Ireland
tel. +353 91 495730
http://sw-app.org
----------------------------------------------------------

François Scharffe wrote:
Hi Michael,

thank you for the link ;)
It seems that the current voiD spec supposes that the linkset (set of interlinks) is supposed to be included in one of the two interlinked datasets. I think it would make sense for the linkset to be considered independently from the two interlinked datasets, something like this:

my:links a void:Linkset ;
         void:target <dataset1> ;
         void:target <dataset2> ;

my:links is a named graph containing the set of owl:same_as links. This would avoiD to bind a dataset with a set of links.

Cheers,
François

Michael Hausenblas wrote:

Just to let you know. One of the outcomes of the recent VoCamps [1] was that we have agreed on a final layout for voiD (Vocabulary of Interlinked Datasets). It is now available at [2] - please note that the actual (final) namespace will be 'http://rdfs.org/ns/void#' ... can't fix everything within two days, right :)

A more detailed user guide to follow soon!

Cheers,
    Michael

PS: A big thanks to the Neologism (http://neologism.deri.ie/) people for creating such an awesome tool and John Breslin for the great support re rdfs.org!

[1] http://vocamp.org/wiki/VoCampGalway2008#Outcomes
[2] http://rdfs.org/ns/neologism/void

----------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan,
Galway, Ireland
----------------------------------------------------------







begin:vcard
fn;quoted-printable:Fran=C3=A7ois Scharffe
n;quoted-printable:Scharffe;Fran=C3=A7ois
org:University of Innsbruck;Semantic Technology Institute
adr:21a Techniker-Strasse;;ICT Building, 2nd floor;Innsbruck;Tirol;6020;Austria
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Phd Student/ Researcher/ Teaching Assistant
tel;work:0043 512 507 6448
tel;fax:0043 512 507 9872
tel;home:don't have
tel;cell:0043 650 72 31 408
note;quoted-printable:my home page:=0D=0A=
	http://www.scharffe.fr
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.sti2.at
version:2.1
end:vcard

Reply via email to