On 10/7/10 1:50 PM, Roberto Mirizzi wrote:
Il 07/10/2010 19:37, Kingsley Idehen ha scritto:
We recently discussed about similar issues, anyway it's still quite
obsure for me why this:
dbpedia:Beijing owl:sameAs ookaboo:topic/28999/Beijing .
Where did that come from? Did you make that claim or did something else?
We discussed here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/dbpedia-discuss...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01945.html
Anyway, here I was just using Paul's example about Bejing. :-)
ookaboo:topic/28999/Beijing rdf:type sioc:ImageGallery.
=> dbpedia:Beijing rdf:type sioc:ImageGallery.
is not a problem.
Is a problem, that's wrong too :-)
That's what I mean. :-) Btw, as Michael reports here:
http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/Community:Overloading_OWL_sameAs,
the issue is old, well-known, and not uniquely solved.
In this case we have a broken triple coming from somewhere. Question is:
where?
Kingsley
Roberto
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
President& CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
