Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?)

[Nathan]

Pete Johnston wrote:
"This document mentions the following class"

It's all very simple really, when you remove all the conflated terms.

What is this:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#";
  xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/";
  xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#";
  xmlns:wdrs="http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#";
  xmlns:dbp="http://dbpedia.org/resource/";
  >

  <dbp:Toucan rdf:about="http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan";>
    <rdfs:label>A Toucan</rdfs:label>
    <foaf:depiction 
rdf:resource="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6d/Pteroglossus-torquatus-001.jpg/250px-Pteroglossus-torquatus-001.jpg"; 
/>
    <rdfs:comment>This resource is an individual toucan that happens to 
live in southern mexico.</rdfs:comment>
    <wdrs:describedby 
rdf:resource="http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan.rdf"/>
  </dbp:Toucan>

  <foaf:Document rdf:about="http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan.rdf";>
    <rdfs:label>A Description of a Toucan</rdfs:label>
    <rdfs:comment>This document is a description of the toucan 
resource.</rdfs:comment>
  </foaf:Document>

</rdf:RDF>

<http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan> is simply another name for 
whatever the above is.

Hints:
 - it's not a resource
 - it's not a document
 - it's not an rdf document
 - it's not a toucan

Best,

Nathan