On 3/30/11 10:47 PM, Michael F Uschold wrote:
A step in the right direction. I look forward to the day when we move
beyond vocabularies and have linked open ontologies.
Michael,
How and why do you conclude that we haven't reached said date? :-)
Kingsley
Michael
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche
<pierre-yves.vandenbuss...@mondeca.com
<mailto:pierre-yves.vandenbuss...@mondeca.com>> wrote:
Hello all,
We are pleased to announce the Linked Open Vocabularies initiative
[1].
The web of data is based on datasets
publication. When building a dataset some questions arise: which
existing vocabularies will be the best-suited for my needs? To
facilitate this task we propose the Linked Open Vocabularies
(LOV) dataset [1]. It identifies the defined vocabularies for
data description but also the relationships between these
vocabularies.
The work within the LOV is not exhaustive but, by suggesting us
some vocabulary modifications and/or creations, we could improve
this dataset.
You could access this dataset via an RDF/XML file [2] and via a
SPARQL Endpoint [3].
[1] http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov/index.html
[2] http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov/lov.rdf
[3] http://labs.mondeca.com/endpoint/lov
Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche, Bernard Vatant, Lise Rozat
Research & Development
Mondeca
3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France
Website: www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com/>
Lab: Mondeca Labs <http://labs.mondeca.com/>
--
Michael Uschold, PhD
Senior Ontology Consultant, Semantic Arts
LinkedIn: http://tr.im/limfu
Skype, Twitter: UscholdM
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
President& CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
