Dear Bradley,

The second part of your plan reminds me of my recent question on "moving" a 
dataset
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2012Apr/0123.html

The object moved (a thesaurus) is quite the same, as the cause for the 
"moving": in both cases an official version has arisen to replace a first 
prototype.

We have tried to create a redirection, using a 301 code. But I guess that if we 
had decided to shut done our server altogether, we would have opted for the 
same 410 code as you!
and maybe we'll do, one day...

Cheers,

Antoine


Back in 2009, as an experiment in working with RDFa and linked data, I created t4gm.info 
<http://t4gm.info>. It is based solely on US Library of Congress library linked data 
(specifically, the Thesaurus for Graphical Materials), which at the time I created the site 
didn't have any equivalently accessible linked data. That has long since been rectified by 
the LoC. So t4gm.info <http://t4gm.info> is at best redundant and at worst 
potentially confusing.

So what I want to do is shut the site down. But there doesn't seem to be much 
if any best practice around doing that, especially when the site by virtue of 
its listing with CKAN is part of the LOD Cloud diagram. What I want to do is 1) 
delist it from CKAN, and then 2) shut the site down, perhaps replacing it with 
a simple web service returning a 410 status code per RFC 2616. I assume it will 
be removed from the LOD cloud diagram when that is next updated from the CKAN 
data.

Anyone have any suggestions beyond that? Also, if anyone from CKAN is reading 
this, I could also use some guidance on how deletion of records is accomplished 
through the online interface. - cheers, BPA

Bradley P. Allen
http://bradleypallen.org


Reply via email to