Sent from my iPhone On Jan 13, 2014, at 5:32 PM, Duncan Bayne <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I understand that's what you're trying to do, but that's different from >> what EME is trying to do. Instead our proposal is limited to >> standardizing the API to the components (CDMs) that implement solutions to >> the studio >> requirements. > > I understand that. What I'm saying is that EME is simply not an > acceptable addition to the Open Web, for reasons that have been > explained in detail, and with some repetition, on this list already. Ok, but also I and others have explained with a similar level of repetition and detail why we think it appropriate and valuable for W3C to work on this. > > What I'm hoping is that there might be an alternative to EME that would > satisfy all parties. It would be great if you could find one. What I am missing is what help you realistically expect in that task ? Certainly, if I was aware of such an alternative I would have no hesitation in proposing it or helping to develop it, but I am not. ...Mark > > -- > Duncan Bayne > ph: +61 420817082 | web: http://duncan-bayne.github.com/ | skype: > duncan_bayne > > I usually check my mail every 24 - 48 hours. If there's something > urgent going on, please send me an SMS or call me. >
