Hello Mark, On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 07:58:31 -0800, Mark Watson <[email protected]> wrote: > (2) I think designing a new solution from those requirements in a public > forum is very unlikely to be successful - for various reasons, not least IP > - and I try not to invest effort in doomed projects
But shouldn't that exactly be the way the W3C works? The W3C follows the Open Stand principles: http://open-stand.org/principles/ (see http://www.w3.org/Consortium/mission#openstand) Which require Openess and Transparency. Something which I find lacking in the EME proposal because it deliberately underspecifies the CDMs and thus makes it implicitly depend on undocumented proprietary black boxes which are illegal to reimplement. Regards, Rüdiger
