Hi June, Thanks for the detailed response. One follow up comment (not for you) below:
> Could the scientific community perform this > vetting and editing function itself, a la wikipedia? We have > found that in general, this does not work. Many scientists > refuse to correct or criticize colleagues directly in a public forum. Could there be a mechanism in place that such contributions (taking the time to politely edit, correct/modify content) would have some brownie points with the establishment. I mean right now, what does a person get for "selflessly" editing content? May be its time citations mechanisms start factoring in "blogosphere activity" ... Just a thought. Regards, Nigam.