On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 23:53 -0400, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: > http://code.google.com/p/owl1-1/wiki/MacrosAndSyntax > > In other words, instead of coming up with a single way of saying some > subset of OWL DL in simpler triples, define a language for creating > such mappings.
If the main motivation is to create a mapping language between the 'complicated', standard OWL-in-RDF representation and a simplified OWL-in-RDF representation, I think a set of SPARQL construct queries or SWRL rules might already be sufficient. -- Matthias