Thanks Joanne.  I certainly agree that the Use Case Template that you have 
linked to is very useful and, in fact, looks very similar to ones that I have 
used in the past in the context of specific software development projects.  I 
think that the current HCLS UC Template is aimed more at being a higher-level 
"scope and boundary of proposed activity" template than a formal "use case for 
software development" template.  As such, perhaps the name "Use Case Template" 
is not quite correct and maybe "Business Use Case" or "Business Scope 
Definition" might be better.  In the end, I think that both templates are 
useful since a single instance of the current HCLS template would naturally 
give rise to multiple instances of your template, all of which would flesh out 
component various operational threads of the upper-level use case/business 
scope defined in the current HCLS template.

Does this make sense to you, or do you think your suggested template 
could/should replace the current HCLS template?

charlie

From: Luciano, Joanne Sylvia [mailto:jluci...@cs.rpi.edu]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 06:34
To: Michel Dumontier
Cc: boy...@u.washington.edu; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: A new potential HCLS use case (scientific discourse)

Hi Michel, Richard, Esteemed Colleagues,

I'd like to propose that we use (add) this use case template that we have found 
useful at RPI:

http://tw.rpi.edu/media/latest/UseCase-Template_SeS    
Download<http://tw.rpi.edu/media/latest/UseCase-Template_SeS>

There are some examples at:  
http://tw.rpi.edu/web/Courses/SemanticeScience/2011    See the reading assigned 
in Class 3 and examples assigned, in preparation for Class 4:  Use Case 
Development

Joanne



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Joanne S. Luciano, PhD
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Research Associate Professor
110 8th Street, Winslow 2143
Tetherless World Constellation
Troy, NY 12180, USA
Department of Computer Science
Email: jluciano @ cs.rpi.edu<http://cs.rpi.edu>
Office Tel. +1.518.276.4939
Global Tel. +1.617.440.4364 (skypeIn)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason 
for existing."  - Albert Einstein


On Oct 9, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Michel Dumontier wrote:


Super! I put the use case in a google document for any to comment:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QpW-axtGL7Tuhd_Zcaf30a4-s4S_lveIJtpKL5QBLfQ/edit?hl=en_US

m.
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Richard Boyce 
<boy...@u.washington.edu<mailto:boy...@u.washington.edu>> wrote:
In response to the recent request, I have attached a draft of a new potential 
HCLS  use case focused especially on scientific discourse.

Any comments, critiques, or suggestions would be welcome.

kind regards,

Richard Boyce, PhD
Assistant Professor of Biomedical Informatics
Scholar, Comparative Effectiveness Research Program
University of Pittsburgh
rd...@pitt.edu<mailto:rd...@pitt.edu>
412-648-6768<tel:412-648-6768>



On 09/26/2011 09:15 AM, Waard, Anita de A (ELS-AMS) wrote:
Dear all,

Further to the first agenda point, use cases, for our call in 42 minutes, I'd 
like to review:

a) The new HCLS Use Case template which can be found here: 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DRnwXw7xIOLTjZ4TUiDtT80ouSQYfUqM9KWKXVgr60s/edit?hl=en_US

b) Our current three use cases: 
http://www.w3.org/wiki/HCLSIG/SWANSIOC/Actions/RhetoricalStructure#Use_Cases

and ask ourselves and each other:

1) Are these use cases still valid, or have they been addressed by our work so 
far?
2) If they are valid, how can we get them to be compliant with the new format: 
can someone take on each use cases?
3) If there's time: brainstorm about other use cases, or otherwise make a plan 
to gather more use cases before the next meeting.

Talk in a bit! Best,

- Anita.

Anita de Waard
Disruptive Technologies Director, Elsevier Labs
http://elsatglabs.com/labs/anita/
a.dewa...@elsevier.com<mailto:a.dewa...@elsevier.com>



-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Clark [mailto:tim.cl...@rcn.com<mailto:tim.cl...@rcn.com>]
Sent: Fri 9/23/2011 11:04
To: HCLS IG; 
scidiscou...@googlegroups.com<mailto:scidiscou...@googlegroups..com>
Cc: Alberto Accomazzi; Allen, Bradley P (ELS-SDG); Sophia Ananiadou; Philip 
Bourne; Gully Burns; Daniel, Ronald (ELS-SDG); Rahul Dave; Waard, Anita de A 
(ELS-AMS); Alf Eaton; Alexander Garcia Castro; Matthew Gamble; Yolanda Gil; 
Alyssa Goodman; Paul Groth; Tudor Groza; Hays, Ellen (ELS-BUR); Maryann 
Martone; David R Newman; Scerri, Antony (ELS-CAM); Jack Park; Silvio Peroni; 
Steve Pettifer; Philippe Rocca-Serra; Cartic Ramakrishnan; Jodi Schneider; 
David Shotton; Kaitlin Thaney; Karin Verspoor; Lynette Hirschman; 
Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Kees van Bochove; Katy Wolstencroft; Jun Zhao
Subject: Reminder: HCLS Sci Disc call - ISA-RDF&  Use Case Review- Mon 26 Sept 
10am-11am EDT / 14:00-15:00 UTC

Colleagues:

This is a reminder for the biweekly HCLS Scientific Discourse concall scheduled 
for Monday, 26 Sept 10am-11am EDT / 14:00-15:00 UTC.

As discussed in the previous call, we'll be focusing on defined tasks and use 
cases for the coming year.

- we will begin a review and update of our use cases

- ISA-RDF will be discussed as a potential shared task for 2011-12 (see 
underlying ISA-TAB project here:  http://isa-tools.org/  for some background)
 Dial-in&  IRC Information

Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200<tel:%2B1.617.761.6200> (Cambridge, MA)
Dial-In #: +33.4.26.46.79.03<tel:%2B33.4.26.46.79.03> (Paris, France)
Dial-In #: +44.203.318.0479<tel:%2B44.203.318.0479> (London, UK)
Participant Access Code: 42572 ("HCLS2")
IRC Channel: irc.w3.org<http://irc.w3.org/> port 6665 channel #HCLS2 use IRC 
direct link or (see W3C IRC page for details, or see Web IRC)
Mibbit quick start: Click on mibbit for instant IRC access
Duration: 1hr
Best

Tim



Elsevier B.V. Registered Office: Radarweg 29, 1043 NX Amsterdam, The 
Netherlands, Registration No. 33156677 (The Netherlands)






--
Michel Dumontier
Associate Professor of Bioinformatics
Carleton University
http://dumontierlab.com<http://dumontierlab.com/>


Reply via email to