I probably will not get to Chicago next week, unfortunately.
On 09/10/2014 03:30 PM, peter.hend...@kp.org wrote:
Sounds good. I'll be in Chicago HL7 next week. Will you too? *NOTICE TO RECIPIENT:* If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. Thank you. From: David Booth <da...@dbooth.org> To: Peter Hendler/CA/KAIPERM@KAIPERM Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org Date: 09/10/2014 12:08 PM Subject: Re: HCLS Agenda Thursday (tomorrow): Roadmap on RDF for Healthcare Information Interoperability (Yosemite Project) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hi Peter, On 09/10/2014 01:03 PM, peter.hend...@kp.org wrote: > We (Kaiser) are working with Ian Horrock's group at Oxford on a project > for automating HEDIS reports using RDFox. > RDFox is a novel kind of RDF store that can use OWL-RL and Datalog and > can do massively parallel processing. Excellent! > > For the RDF models, I really hope they are not so ad hoc, but that they > follow the HL7 V3 backbone idea of starting top ontology levels with > Entities Roles participations and Acts. It is key to have this for all > of the models to be HL7 compatible. If the RDF healthcare models start > with this level, then they will be compatible with HL7 V2 and CDA etc. Certainly the intent is to make use of existing models -- HL7 and others. In particular, to: - Capture *existing* and new models -- whatever they are -- in RDF and OWL so that they have a common semantic basis, and relationships between them can then be captured in RDF and OWL. - Promote standards convergence of those models -- to reduce or eliminate redundancy -- using RDF and OWL as a common semantic basis for expressing them. - Facilitate crowd-sourcing of data translations for instance data express in different data models and vocabularies, by using RDF as a common information representation. David > > > > > *NOTICE TO RECIPIENT:* If you are not the intended recipient of this > e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or > disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, > please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently > delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or > saving them. Thank you. > > > > > From: David Booth <da...@dbooth.org> > To: w3c semweb HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> > Date: 09/10/2014 08:43 AM > Subject: Re: HCLS Agenda Thursday (tomorrow): Roadmap on RDF for > Healthcare Information Interoperability (Yosemite Project) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > P.S. If anyone is interested but cannot make this call tomorrow, please > let me know by email, so that we can follow up separately. I still want > your input! > > On 09/10/2014 11:36 AM, David Booth wrote: > > Agenda Thursday (tomorrow): > > > > 1. Yosemite Project: A Roadmap for Healthcare Information > > Interoperability, based on RDF as a universal information exchange > > language. These slides were presented at the Semantic Technology and > > Business Conference in August, and a draft version was discussed on a > > previous HCLS call. This will be a rapid review, followed by > > solicitation of comments/suggestions: Is this roadmap correct? > > Complete? How might it be better described? Slides: > > http://dbooth.org/2014/yosemite/yosemite-project-slides.pdf > > > > 2. Discuss potential collaboration and funding strategies for the > > Yosemite Project roadmap. > > > > > Thursdays, 11:00am Eastern US (Boston) time zone > > > Zakim (W3C teleconference bridge). > > > Dial-In #: _+1.617.761.6200_ <tel:%2B1.617.761.6200> (Cambridge, MA) > > > VoIP address: _sip:zakim@voip.w3.org_ > > > Participant Access Code: 4257 ("HCLS") > > > IRC: _irc.w3.org_ <http://irc.w3.org/> port 6665 channel #HCLS > > > > Thanks, > > David > >
