* Anne van Kesteren wrote: >On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:47:37 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: >> 3) The spec as written doesn't "state nothing", it appears to clearly >> require sending an entity body and does not allow ignoring the body or >> throwing an exception regardless of what is allowed per RFC. So some >> change is needed, one way or another. > >Ok. How about we add a step 5 of the send() algorithm that states that >additional requirements in RFC 2616 are also to be taken into account. >That should effectively defer the issue to RFC 2616.
You have to elaborate on this suggestion; there is already a fifth step and taking something into account could mean just about anything so I'm not sure what you are proposing. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
