On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Charles McCathieNevile <cha...@opera.com> wrote: > On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:23:38 +0100, Adrian Bateman <adria...@microsoft.com> > wrote: > >> ...As I noted at TPAC, at Microsoft we don't think we'll collectively be >> able to achieve reasonable interop because of the SQL dialect issue ...it >> seems unlikely that there will be two independent interoperable >> implementations at the SQL level which makes moving to Last Call potentially >> problematic... > > I expect to see interoperable implementations from Opera and Apple/Chrome - > so although you can argue that iPhone-Safari and Safari are hardly > independent, I think we will easily get a couple of truly independent > interoperable versions.
I just want to make it clear that I don't consider multiple implementations based on SQLite to be "independent". However I realize that that is my interpretation of the independence requirement, others might not share it. I'm also not sure if Operas implementation *is* in fact based on SQLite. If it's not then I agree they are truly independent. / Jonas
