On Wednesday 04 January 2012 09:19:51 Arthur Barstow wrote: > In case it isn't clear, I don't think anyone suggested the ECC stuff > should be "deprecated". On the contrary, I think it makes sense for ECC > to be an algorithm for XMLDigSig1.1. However, some of us have advocated > the syntax be separated from the algorithms. That would permit the > Syntax spec move to REC separately and the algorithm spec(s) could > advance separately (as the market determines the "winner(s)").
This could be a valid conclusion for a PAG BTW Rigo
