On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Ms2ger <ms2...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/27/2012 02:16 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > >> On 11/27/12 12:21 AM, ext Jungkee Song wrote: >> >>> From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com] >>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 3:05 AM >>>> >>>> I think the next step is for the XHR Editors to create a TR version >>>> using the WD template so that everyone can see exactly what is being >>>> proposed for publication as a TR. Please create that version as soon as >>>> you can so that this CfC can be based on that version (rather than the >>>> ED) and reply with the URL of the TR version. >>>> >>>> (Please use 6 December 2012 as the publication date.) >>>> >>> We prepared a proposed TR version at: >>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-**file/tip/TR/Overview.html<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/tip/TR/Overview.html> >>> >> >> Thanks Jungkee. >> >> All - >> <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/**raw-file/tip/TR/Overview.html<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/tip/TR/Overview.html>> >> is the >> document proposed for publication as a TR and thus is the basis for this >> CfC. >> > > I object to this publication because of this change: > > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/rev/**2341e31323a4<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/rev/2341e31323a4> > > pushed with a misleading commit message. >
since you don't say what is misleading, and since commit messages are irrelevant for W3C process, this objection is immaterial