On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.bars...@gmail.com> wrote: > Although there appears to be agreement that work on the [uievents] spec > should stop, the various replies raise sufficient questions that I consider > this CfC (as written) as failed. > > Travis, Gary - would you please make a specific proposal for these two > specs? In particular, what is the title and shortname for each document, and > which spec/shortname becomes the WG Note? > > After we have agreed on a way forward, I'll start a new CfC. > > (I believe the Principle of Least Surprise here means considering specs that > currently reference [uievents] or [DOM-Level-3-Events]. F.ex., I suppose a > document titled "UI Events" with a shortname of DOM-Level-3-Events could be > a bit confusing to some, although strictly speaking could be done.)
My proposal would be to update UI Events with the latest editor's draft of DOM Level 3 Events (title renamed, of course) and have the DOM Level 3 Events URL redirect to UI Events. That would communicate clearly what happened. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
