+1 On 19-Nov-2014 8:07 pm, "Anne van Kesteren" <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.bars...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Although there appears to be agreement that work on the [uievents] spec > > should stop, the various replies raise sufficient questions that I > consider > > this CfC (as written) as failed. > > > > Travis, Gary - would you please make a specific proposal for these two > > specs? In particular, what is the title and shortname for each document, > and > > which spec/shortname becomes the WG Note? > > > > After we have agreed on a way forward, I'll start a new CfC. > > > > (I believe the Principle of Least Surprise here means considering specs > that > > currently reference [uievents] or [DOM-Level-3-Events]. F.ex., I suppose > a > > document titled "UI Events" with a shortname of DOM-Level-3-Events could > be > > a bit confusing to some, although strictly speaking could be done.) > > My proposal would be to update UI Events with the latest editor's > draft of DOM Level 3 Events (title renamed, of course) and have the > DOM Level 3 Events URL redirect to UI Events. That would communicate > clearly what happened. > > > -- > https://annevankesteren.nl/ > >