On 04/12/2017 10:48 AM, Austin Macdonald wrote: > I like pulp3 better, but it has some weirdness. I'm stating the obvious, > but we wouldn't be able to keep the name for pulp 4. When we put our major > versions on PyPI, they will all be treated as completely separate projects. > I don't see a big problem there, but it is unusual.
You can do a little handwave and say "uh, it's pulp for python3! yeah!" and feel good about pulp3 again, I think. :)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
