Another alternative: plp Pros: - super short! - pinky typing exercise
Cons: - Fonts are silly: plp (PLP) looks like pIp (PIP) - sounds "web 2.0" On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Sean Myers <sean.my...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 04/12/2017 10:48 AM, Austin Macdonald wrote: > > I like pulp3 better, but it has some weirdness. I'm stating the obvious, > > but we wouldn't be able to keep the name for pulp 4. When we put our > major > > versions on PyPI, they will all be treated as completely separate > projects. > > I don't see a big problem there, but it is unusual. > > You can do a little handwave and say "uh, it's pulp for python3! yeah!" and > feel good about pulp3 again, I think. :) > > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
