I'm not a fan of plp, it does look too much like pip IMO On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Austin Macdonald <amacd...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Another alternative: plp > > Pros: > - super short! > - pinky typing exercise > > Cons: > - Fonts are silly: plp (PLP) looks like pIp (PIP) > - sounds "web 2.0" > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Sean Myers <sean.my...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> On 04/12/2017 10:48 AM, Austin Macdonald wrote: >> > I like pulp3 better, but it has some weirdness. I'm stating the obvious, >> > but we wouldn't be able to keep the name for pulp 4. When we put our >> major >> > versions on PyPI, they will all be treated as completely separate >> projects. >> > I don't see a big problem there, but it is unusual. >> >> You can do a little handwave and say "uh, it's pulp for python3! yeah!" >> and >> feel good about pulp3 again, I think. :) >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev