> 2) pulp3 > - is ambiguous regardless of if the 3 is for Pulp3 or Python3.
Yes. Also, using "pulp3" makes it easy for a naming conflict to occur with the existing PuLP <https://pypi.python.org/pypi/PuLP> package. What happens when their project also gets to version 3? Or when their project gets to version 4, and downstream packagers want to have a separate package for versions 4 and 3 of PuLP? One could say that this won't be an issue on account of the differing capitalization of the projects' names. But I don't think that capitalization is a good differentiator, as demonstrated by the NetworkManager project. And less importantly, using "pulp3" will force us to switch to "pulp4," "pulp5," etc as new major versions of Pulp come out.
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
