So looks like based on previous input, the results are: 1) PyPI name is ---> pulpproj
2) The answer to the question: Will all packages install under a top level directory or not? YES and it will look like: https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2444#Will-all-packages-install-under-a-top-level-directory-or-not If you deathly disagree please speak out now, otherwise these would be the final decision taken in order to complete https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2444 -------- Regards, Ina Panova Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. "Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Michael Hrivnak <mhriv...@redhat.com> wrote: > Since "app" is a specific concept within Pulp (both a celery app and one > or more django apps), it could be awkward for the entire python namespace > to include the word "app". "import pulpapp.app" feels odd. I would stick > with something that does not overlap with the name of any existing > component or concept in Pulp. > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Ina Panova <ipan...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> we have not considered yet 'pulpapp' >> >> pip install pulpapp >> pip install pulpapp_cli >> pip install pulpapp_streamer >> >> >> >> -------- >> Regards, >> >> Ina Panova >> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. >> >> "Do not go where the path may lead, >> go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." >> >> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Ina Panova <ipan...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> I went through all the thread and I personally do not like any of >>> options. >>> >>> -1 pulp3 >>> +0 pulpproj >>> -0 pulp_platform >>> -1 plp >>> >>> >>> I somehow agree what Jeff pointed out but looks like pulpproj given the >>> current situation is the 'winner'. >>> >>> I do not know what to do about this, but maybe email our community and >>> ask what do they think? maybe they will come up with new ideas. Not sure if >>> it is a good idea, though. >>> >>> >>> >>> -------- >>> Regards, >>> >>> Ina Panova >>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. >>> >>> "Do not go where the path may lead, >>> go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Dennis Kliban <dkli...@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 to pulpproj >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Sean Myers <sean.my...@redhat.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 04/19/2017 12:02 PM, Brian Bouterse wrote: >>>>> > Two fyi's relating to the names. (1) pulpproj is our twitter handle. >>>>> Both >>>>> > pulp and pulpproject were already taken. (2) I agree that pulp3 >>>>> could be a >>>>> > headache down the road regardless of if the 3 is for Pulp3 or >>>>> Python3. >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, I was only kidding about the python3 thing, it's too ambiguous. >>>>> >>>>> I'm still +1 pulpproj >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> >> > > > -- > > Michael Hrivnak > > Principal Software Engineer, RHCE > > Red Hat >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
