we have not considered yet 'pulpapp' pip install pulpapp pip install pulpapp_cli pip install pulpapp_streamer
-------- Regards, Ina Panova Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. "Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Ina Panova <ipan...@redhat.com> wrote: > I went through all the thread and I personally do not like any of options. > > -1 pulp3 > +0 pulpproj > -0 pulp_platform > -1 plp > > > I somehow agree what Jeff pointed out but looks like pulpproj given the > current situation is the 'winner'. > > I do not know what to do about this, but maybe email our community and ask > what do they think? maybe they will come up with new ideas. Not sure if it > is a good idea, though. > > > > -------- > Regards, > > Ina Panova > Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. > > "Do not go where the path may lead, > go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Dennis Kliban <dkli...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> +1 to pulpproj >> >> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Sean Myers <sean.my...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 04/19/2017 12:02 PM, Brian Bouterse wrote: >>> > Two fyi's relating to the names. (1) pulpproj is our twitter handle. >>> Both >>> > pulp and pulpproject were already taken. (2) I agree that pulp3 could >>> be a >>> > headache down the road regardless of if the 3 is for Pulp3 or Python3. >>> >>> Yeah, I was only kidding about the python3 thing, it's too ambiguous. >>> >>> I'm still +1 pulpproj >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev