I agree. I think a year though is highly unlikely. It’s kind of hard to predict right now because we don’t have a concrete roadmap for what needs to be done for Pulp 3 GA. Once we release the RC (or perhaps before), we’ll develop a milestone/roadmap for GA which should give us a better idea of how long the RC period will be.
David On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 8:45 AM Bryan Kearney <bkear...@redhat.com> wrote: > -- pulp-list > > RC for a year? That seems way long. I get the idea of semanti=c > versioning, but is there any other path for that? > > --bk > > On 1/30/19 5:28 PM, David Davis wrote: > > We’re approaching an RC release of Pulp 3.0 and we’ve put together a > > blog post with some information about this release: > > > > https://pulpproject.org/2019/01/30/pulp-3-rc-information/ > > > > Please feel free to respond to this email with any questions, comments, > > or concerns you have about the RC. > > > > David > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pulp-list mailing list > > pulp-l...@redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
