The long RC is, in-part, to ensure that Pulp 3.0.0 is fully usable for Katello. Related to that, one question I keep wondering is: when will Pulp3 land in an upstream Katello release and for which plugins? I've lost touch with that conversation so I have no idea what to expect. I believe Pulp3 being offered in Katello will greatly inform confidence in the 3.0.0 release candidate going GA.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 8:45 AM Bryan Kearney <bkear...@redhat.com> wrote: > -- pulp-list > > RC for a year? That seems way long. I get the idea of semanti=c > versioning, but is there any other path for that? > > --bk > > On 1/30/19 5:28 PM, David Davis wrote: > > We’re approaching an RC release of Pulp 3.0 and we’ve put together a > > blog post with some information about this release: > > > > https://pulpproject.org/2019/01/30/pulp-3-rc-information/ > > > > Please feel free to respond to this email with any questions, comments, > > or concerns you have about the RC. > > > > David > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pulp-list mailing list > > pulp-l...@redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
