> > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 8:45 AM Bryan Kearney <[email protected]> wrote: > >> -- pulp-list >> >> RC for a year? That seems way long. I get the idea of semanti=c >> versioning, but is there any other path for that? >> >> We haven't really discussed this idea, so this is just me talking: Another possible path would be to GA much sooner with a high likelihood of a Pulp 4 (and maybe 5) in the next year. This would be a more normal way to go IMO, but I'd hate to spook downstream.
> --bk >> >> On 1/30/19 5:28 PM, David Davis wrote: >> > We’re approaching an RC release of Pulp 3.0 and we’ve put together a >> > blog post with some information about this release: >> > >> > https://pulpproject.org/2019/01/30/pulp-3-rc-information/ >> > >> > Please feel free to respond to this email with any questions, comments, >> > or concerns you have about the RC. >> > >> > David >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Pulp-list mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
