In my opinion, it's a part of triage or grooming process. Triage leader (for issues) and a person who grooms the task should pay attention to the tags.
Tanya On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:47 PM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: > Looking in redmine at our current sprint, I see several issues that don’t > have Pulp 3 tag that should. Here are some: > > https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4587 > <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4587>https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4595 > <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4595>https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4577 > <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4577>https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4576 > <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4576>https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4545 > > <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4545>Talking with the QE team, it’s > difficult for them to get a feel for how much Pulp 2 vs Pulp 3 work there > is. I guess we could try to get better about tagging issues when we create > them? > > However, at least one issue is by someone outside the core Pulp team and I > am not sure community members will know to tag their issues w/ Pulp 3 tag. > Are there any other alternatives to ensuring Pulp 3 issues get properly > tagged? > > David > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
