+1 to create a pulp2 tag after mass-close
-------- Regards, Ina Panova Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. "Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 3:48 PM Brian Bouterse <bbout...@redhat.com> wrote: > Great idea David! > > Once we get through tomorrow's mass-close, let's plan a transition to > remove the Pulp3 tag and introduce a Pulp 2 tag instead. > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:34 AM Dana Walker <dawal...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Dana Walker >> >> Software Engineer >> >> Red Hat >> >> <https://www.redhat.com> >> >> <https://red.ht/sig> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:22 AM Daniel Alley <dal...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> I feel like using the Pulp 3 tag is suboptimal since we are closing out >>>> most of our Pulp 2 issues and a majority of the new bugs/tasks/stories are >>>> for Pulp 3. Wouldn’t it make more sense to create a Pulp 2 tag and use it >>>> on the rare Pulp 2 issues that get filed? >>> >>> >>> Agreed, +1 to having a "Pulp 2" tag to replace the Pulp 3 tag. >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:19 AM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I feel like using the Pulp 3 tag is suboptimal since we are closing out >>>> most of our Pulp 2 issues and a majority of the new bugs/tasks/stories are >>>> for Pulp 3. Wouldn’t it make more sense to create a Pulp 2 tag and use it >>>> on the rare Pulp 2 issues that get filed? >>>> >>>> David >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 8:27 AM Ina Panova <ipan...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 to handle tag during the triage process >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -------- >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Ina Panova >>>>> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. >>>>> >>>>> "Do not go where the path may lead, >>>>> go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:53 PM Brian Bouterse <bbout...@redhat.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 to Tanya's suggestion. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also I have an action item to start a separate thread on how we can >>>>>> plan-and-then-close all pulp2 bugs that we are not actively working on. I >>>>>> wanted to mention it here to identify it as a possible resolution to this >>>>>> issue since it was related. I'll send this today. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:54 AM Tatiana Tereshchenko < >>>>>> ttere...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> In my opinion, it's a part of triage or grooming process. >>>>>>> Triage leader (for issues) and a person who grooms the task should >>>>>>> pay attention to the tags. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tanya >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:47 PM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Looking in redmine at our current sprint, I see several issues that >>>>>>>> don’t have Pulp 3 tag that should. Here are some: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4587 >>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4587>https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4595 >>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4595>https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4577 >>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4577>https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4576 >>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4576>https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4545 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4545>Talking with the QE team, it’s >>>>>>>> difficult for them to get a feel for how much Pulp 2 vs Pulp 3 work >>>>>>>> there >>>>>>>> is. I guess we could try to get better about tagging issues when we >>>>>>>> create >>>>>>>> them? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> However, at least one issue is by someone outside the core Pulp >>>>>>>> team and I am not sure community members will know to tag their issues >>>>>>>> w/ >>>>>>>> Pulp 3 tag. Are there any other alternatives to ensuring Pulp 3 issues >>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>> properly tagged? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> David >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev