> > I feel like using the Pulp 3 tag is suboptimal since we are closing out > most of our Pulp 2 issues and a majority of the new bugs/tasks/stories are > for Pulp 3. Wouldn’t it make more sense to create a Pulp 2 tag and use it > on the rare Pulp 2 issues that get filed?
Agreed, +1 to having a "Pulp 2" tag to replace the Pulp 3 tag. On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:19 AM David Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > I feel like using the Pulp 3 tag is suboptimal since we are closing out > most of our Pulp 2 issues and a majority of the new bugs/tasks/stories are > for Pulp 3. Wouldn’t it make more sense to create a Pulp 2 tag and use it > on the rare Pulp 2 issues that get filed? > > David > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 8:27 AM Ina Panova <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 to handle tag during the triage process >> >> >> -------- >> Regards, >> >> Ina Panova >> Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. >> >> "Do not go where the path may lead, >> go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:53 PM Brian Bouterse <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 to Tanya's suggestion. >>> >>> Also I have an action item to start a separate thread on how we can >>> plan-and-then-close all pulp2 bugs that we are not actively working on. I >>> wanted to mention it here to identify it as a possible resolution to this >>> issue since it was related. I'll send this today. >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:54 AM Tatiana Tereshchenko <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> In my opinion, it's a part of triage or grooming process. >>>> Triage leader (for issues) and a person who grooms the task should pay >>>> attention to the tags. >>>> >>>> Tanya >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:47 PM David Davis <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Looking in redmine at our current sprint, I see several issues that >>>>> don’t have Pulp 3 tag that should. Here are some: >>>>> >>>>> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4587 >>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4587>https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4595 >>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4595>https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4577 >>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4577>https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4576 >>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4576>https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4545 >>>>> >>>>> <https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4545>Talking with the QE team, it’s >>>>> difficult for them to get a feel for how much Pulp 2 vs Pulp 3 work there >>>>> is. I guess we could try to get better about tagging issues when we create >>>>> them? >>>>> >>>>> However, at least one issue is by someone outside the core Pulp team >>>>> and I am not sure community members will know to tag their issues w/ Pulp >>>>> 3 >>>>> tag. Are there any other alternatives to ensuring Pulp 3 issues get >>>>> properly tagged? >>>>> >>>>> David >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
