https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93946
--- Comment #24 from Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> ---
(In reply to David Henningsson from comment #23)
> I disagree that this is a regression - the phantom internal speaker is a bug
> caused by lower layers (ALSA/BIOS/hw). We should not revert the change when
> it improves routing in several other scenarios; as we would then regress
> those scenarios instead.
You already agreed that it's a valid thing to expect HDMI continue working
after display going to sleep. That use case worked before, now it doesn't work.
Clearly a regression.
It's true that reverting the patch in 9.0 will cause a regression for those
users who liked the new feature in 8.0, but the thing is that the patch should
never have been applied in the first place.
> Also, I'm far from confident that what you're proposing won't cause
> regressions in some other scenario.
Then we'll fix those issues or revert my patch in 10.0.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-bugs mailing list
pulseaudio-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-bugs
