On May 14, 2010, at 3:42 PM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
----- "Michael DeHaan" <[email protected]> wrote:
What if instead of keeping them in differnet scope we instead just
used the stages to affect where the priority lives on the graph....
thus things could still require the resource, and the resource can
only live in ones stage?
this was my intention first, the stages should just be anchors in
the tree
and you can require/before those anchors.
This ended up being much more complicated to implement, for reasons I
can't seem to remember on Sunday night, whereas the stages as
implemented were fantastically easy, which to me meant they fit the
model better.
--
Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go
away. -- Philip K. Dick, "How to Build a Universe"
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Luke Kanies -|- http://puppetlabs.com -|- +1(615)594-8199
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet
Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
