----- "R.I.Pienaar" <[email protected]> wrote: > ----- "Luke Kanies" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Anyway, as I said above, we've gotten pretty far afield from where > > > this started. I think the solution for 2.6 is to include Ohad's > > variant of extlookup, probably naming the function 'lookup'. As > much > > as I'd love to get it static, I don't think it's reasonable on the > > > timeframe we're on. > > if you did http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1545 you'd get > module path searching for free in extlookup.
actually i lie, it wouldnt work with environments still but thats an easy fix. > And you wouldnt loose the features ohad didnt implement in his version > of extlookup. point remains, if you merge Ohads version that lacks some features, current extlookup users will be still stuck maintaining extlookup probably. You never replied to my mail regarding the nasty global variable approach to configuring both extlookup and ohad's that I think just isnt right if you're going to merge it. Can you think of a quick easy way to improve that? -- R.I.Pienaar -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
