On Jun 9, 2010, at 5:09 AM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
----- "R.I.Pienaar" <[email protected]> wrote:
----- "Luke Kanies" <[email protected]> wrote:
Anyway, as I said above, we've gotten pretty far afield from where
this started. I think the solution for 2.6 is to include Ohad's
variant of extlookup, probably naming the function 'lookup'. As
much
as I'd love to get it static, I don't think it's reasonable on the
timeframe we're on.
if you did http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1545 you'd get
module path searching for free in extlookup.
actually i lie, it wouldnt work with environments still but thats an
easy fix.
And you wouldnt loose the features ohad didnt implement in his
version
of extlookup.
point remains, if you merge Ohads version that lacks some features,
current extlookup users will be still stuck maintaining extlookup
probably.
You never replied to my mail regarding the nasty global variable
approach to configuring both extlookup and ohad's that I think just
isnt right if you're going to merge it. Can you think of a quick
easy way to improve that?
What is the global variable problem, again?
--
It's not the voting that's democracy, it's the counting.
-- Tom Stoppard
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Luke Kanies -|- http://puppetlabs.com -|- +1(615)594-8199
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet
Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
