----- "Luke Kanies" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jun 9, 2010, at 5:04 AM, R.I.Pienaar wrote: > > > > > ----- "Luke Kanies" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> Anyway, as I said above, we've gotten pretty far afield from where > >> this started. I think the solution for 2.6 is to include Ohad's > >> variant of extlookup, probably naming the function 'lookup'. As > much > >> as I'd love to get it static, I don't think it's reasonable on the > >> timeframe we're on. > > > > if you did http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1545 you'd get > > > module path searching for free in extlookup. > > Ok, I've fixed this and it should slide into 2.6. > > > And you wouldnt loose the features ohad didnt implement in his > > version of extlookup. > > I think a big part of what we're interested in that Ohad has is the > yaml support, rather than CSV.
It really is no challenge to get extlookup to speak yaml, people have it speaking to all sorts of sources even ldap. What would be useful is instead of randomly going picking implementations if you can say what you want to change and I can look at doing that. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
