Hi all, I'm reviewing a ticket related to how we handle "undef" when it is passed to a puppet function. The current behavior is to convert it to an empty string before passing it off to the function body, but I'm not sure that's the right thing to do as it seems to eliminate the ability to handle some valid use cases where there is a semantic distinction between "undef" and the empty string.
This behavior has been discussed before--about a year ago--and it seems like there were some folks in favor of the current empty-string approach. I'd welcome comments on the ticket! http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/13210 Thanks Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-dev@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
