Nick Lewis wrote: > On Thursday, May 10, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Ashley Penney wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:42 AM, Jeff Weiss <jeff.we...@puppetlabs.com >> <mailto:jeff.we...@puppetlabs.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Fourth, Peter, Émile, and Trevor (or anyone else experiencing the >>> problem), would you be willing to be pre-release testers of >>> improvements? Our ops team is seeing the problem too, but that's only >>> a single real-world data point. We need to make sure we don't >>> self-optimize. We need your help to make sure the performance fixes >>> address *your* problems not just ours. >> >> I just wanted to chime in to offer to test any performance patches >> because I'm definitely interested in helping get to the bottom of any >> performance drops. We also see the massive memory use during run >> issues other people have seen which has resulted in us stopping puppet >> runs on certain over-commited boxes as it can tip them over the edge. >> Anything that targets either of this areas is something I'll happily >> hack in by hand for testing purposes. (I have 4 puppetmasters >> currently so it's easy to target just a few and not the rest >> for comparisons). > > On that note: After spending a few hours hunting yesterday, we > identified the cause of a significant performance regression in > compilation when using modules with metadata. I've attached a patch for > anyone who would like to test it out. We're seeing approximately 5-10x > faster compilation. >
Kudos guys! That's awesome. James -- James Turnbull Puppet Labs 1-503-734-8571 To schedule a meeting with me: http://tungle.me/jamtur01 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-dev@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
