W dniu sobota, 18 stycznia 2014 18:20:16 UTC+1 użytkownik Felix Frank napisał: > > On 01/16/2014 01:01 AM, James Turnbull wrote: > > I think this is a broadly good idea but I've got one concern about the > > on ramp to using Puppet. Whatever is done, pull out some/pull out all, > > the user experience of getting started with Puppet should remain > > seamless or at least as good as it is now. For example, if there's > > suddenly another step to get started with Puppet, i.e.: > > > > 1. Install Puppet. > > 2. Add resources. > > 3. See Puppet in action. > > > > Then I think the getting started user experience suffers. Especially > > with so many tutorials out there that just assume various resources will > > be available. If the user gets some esoteric error (Dog forbid Puppet > > having an esoteric error :)) when they try to run a local .pp file or do > > a puppet resource then that's a big turn-off. > > > > Puppet's learning curve can be steep for many users. Let's not make it > > any harder. > > I feel that this is a very valid point. As Pawel pointed out, this can > be approached with package dependencies. > > Would it make sense to take this a step further and rename the remainder > of puppet to puppet-core and supplement it with, say, > puppet-core-modules? Puppet proper would comprise both. > > Just a thought. >
You may wish to look at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/puppet-bsd/g5DDPd3PL-U. These people seem to think about similar approach to packaging puppet for FreeBSD. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/cde00b49-7094-488b-bf54-3a660c4e43e7%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
