I like a constrains style solution much better myself to, wasn't aware of it at the time.
I think with Puppet 4 we could introduce some additional pain, semver wise we'd be allowed to do that. If that helped fix this issue once and for all I'm pretty sure the community would support it too. On Wednesday, 19 February 2014 23:31:24 UTC+1, Markus wrote: > > > > > I'm not very fond of the idea of hardwiring special support for > > Package resources into Puppet (nor for resources of any other specific > > type). I still like my "constraints" idea, to which Felix directed > > your attention, but if something like that is ever implemented then > > adopting it will require (smallish) modifications to be made to a lot > > of manifests. > > +1 to a constraints style solution. Figuring how to do it without > causing a lot of widespread minor pain would be an added plus. :) > > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/d680773d-57bb-49e5-9875-f543ace773b0%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
