Breaking this on 4.0 is OK with semver . breaking it on 4.1 would be a
mess.

Best
Lmello
Em 20/11/2014 10:08, "Felix Frank" <[email protected]>
escreveu:

> On 11/20/2014 12:17 PM, Daniele Sluijters wrote:
> >     First question is, can you gracefully deprecate a line of agents,
> i.e.
> >     retain 3.x agent compatibility throughout 4.x masters, and drop it
> >     at 5.0.
> >     I shall assume that the engineering effort to go such a route would
> >     be a
> >     magnitude or two above just dropping cross-version support, so doing
> >     the
> >     hard cut is likely the right thing to do. But I will go on record
> >     stating that this is not the kind of decision that should be made
> >     lightly.
> >
> >
> > But why not do it in Puppet 4 but do it in Puppet 5? This seems
> > completely arbitrary like "I would prefer if you hold off to Puppet 5",
> > but what's to stop it from going "I would prefer to hold off until
> > Puppet 6" by the time 5 is ready to roll out?
> >
> > Now, that was your first question, what's the second?
>
> Granted, 5.0 is somewhat arbitrary. Not breaking 3.x support before the
> 4.1 master would also go a long way, too, for example.
>
> The point is, do I need to introduce a turning point at which each of my
> agents will either
> a) talk to the obosolete 3.x master only or
> b) talk to the newly added 4.x master only
>
> With a deprecation period, I can replace the 3.x master with 4.0 after
> making sure that no major breakage follows suit, without the pressure of
> updating each last agent (or live with two sets of potentially diverging
> masters). It is only the 4.1 master that will not be viable until agents
> are upgraded.
>
> I regard this as an advantage because such minor updates are generally
> less problematic (and fear inducing to the ops team).
>
> The second question is the one Eric posed initially: Is a major version
> change an opportune time to break the network in this fashion. The
> answer to this is most definitely "yes" and - again - I'm not actively
> contesting the choice to do this with 4.0.
>
> Cheers,
> Felix
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Puppet Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/546DD9BB.5080901%40alumni.tu-berlin.de
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/CAM%3D8oN%2Bc%2BxFA%2B0W014Y7OUufEuiuxw7c2sPXQZ2aRadzf-%2BGdw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to