Nigel Kersten <[email protected]> writes: > Honestly, you should be discovering such missing requires in your > testing process. It's not good practice to simply run another one "just > in case" in my opinion.
That's easy to say in theory, but extremely difficult to test in practice, since order is non-deterministic and therefore you may not notice a missing requires unless you get lucky, even in test. You need multiple iterations in test to probabilistically find all missing requires, which quickly becomes more trouble than it's worth when the only drawback is requiring multiple Puppet runs. We too consider this to be a bug, but it's a low-priority bug that we fix when we notice it, which can take a while. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
