On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Joe McDonagh <joseph.e.mcdon...@gmail.com> wrote: > I care a lot and had thought that the path would eventually be the main key > for retrieving files, with the checksum being sort of like a revision, with > some extra metadata when you interfaces with the filebucket...
ok. So it's unacceptable for you to refer to logs or reports to get the checksum for a given replacement and then restore the file that way? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
