> >>I don’t really understand above sentence, sorry. But if we use an > >>extra bridge for each tab we do not have to search for the right device? > > Well, you need to test through each fwbrXXXiY sequentially to find the good > one. > (or maybe I miss something ?) could be provide a example of what of have in > mind ?
Your are right (I am confused, sorry). > > >>3.) does not work with OVS > > well, for ovs + tapbridge, it's working fine now ;) > > >>Sure. But I asume it would simplify things if we use exactly the same setup. > > I agreed too ! > > something like: > --------------- > linux bridge vmbr0 > ------------ > > vmbr0<-->vethXXXiY (+vlan)<-->fwbrXXXiY<-->tapXXXiY > > ovs bridge vmbr0 > ---------------- > vmbr0<-->ovsintXXXiY (+vlan)<-->fwbrXXXiY<-->tapXXXiY > > > seem good ? Yes. Do you have some time to implement that to test performance? _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list [email protected] http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
