>>Yes. Do you have some time to implement that to test performance?

yes, no problem. not today, but tomorrow I'll have time.

I would like also to give some love to openvz veth management.
Do you known where I can add some code to manage network bridge,ovs,.. ? (like 
for qemu in Network.pm)



----- Mail original ----- 

De: "Dietmar Maurer" <[email protected]> 
À: "Alexandre DERUMIER" <[email protected]> 
Cc: [email protected] 
Envoyé: Mercredi 23 Avril 2014 10:46:59 
Objet: RE: [pve-devel] [PATCH] openvswitch hybrid network model implementation 

> >>I don’t really understand above sentence, sorry. But if we use an 
> >>extra bridge for each tab we do not have to search for the right device? 
> 
> Well, you need to test through each fwbrXXXiY sequentially to find the good 
> one. 
> (or maybe I miss something ?) could be provide a example of what of have in 
> mind ? 

Your are right (I am confused, sorry). 

> > >>3.) does not work with OVS 
> > well, for ovs + tapbridge, it's working fine now ;) 
> 
> >>Sure. But I asume it would simplify things if we use exactly the same 
> >>setup. 
> 
> I agreed too ! 
> 
> something like: 
> --------------- 
> linux bridge vmbr0 
> ------------ 
> 
> vmbr0<-->vethXXXiY (+vlan)<-->fwbrXXXiY<-->tapXXXiY 
> 
> ovs bridge vmbr0 
> ---------------- 
> vmbr0<-->ovsintXXXiY (+vlan)<-->fwbrXXXiY<-->tapXXXiY 
> 
> 
> seem good ? 

Yes. Do you have some time to implement that to test performance? 
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

Reply via email to