On 11/10/2016 6:39 PM, Eneko Lacunza wrote:
I linked the bugreport, not that I care really :)
If you read through the bug report it turns out to be:
a). an xattr issue, not filename size
b). A bug in ceph which assumes that the zfs max xattr size is far
smaller than it is.
They're not developing a new filesystem (that is the point after all),
I meant the disk control layer, not the filesystem. And it removes all
ability to uses anything but raw disks.
and yes, it performs much better.
Last I saw they were have big regression issues with various IO sizes.
Its a long way off.
--
Lindsay Mathieson
_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@pve.proxmox.com
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
